Amistad :: essays research papers

Amistad is about a mutiny in 1839 aboard a slave ship, La Amistad, which at last comes to port in New England. The West Africans who have commandeered the ship are taken into custody and the plot revolves around who "owns" them or if, indeed, they should be freed. This sets up the master(prenominal)(prenominal) event of the film, a courtroom drama about rights and origins, with the required flashbacks to the voyage and the gruesome conditions aboard the ship. The problem with this approach is that we learn less about the substantial conditions of slavery and instead focus on the more sanitized conditions surrounding the courtroom. In addition, we get a film which is largely about the efforts of the whites battling the case and often less about the struggles of the Africans themselves.There are too many strands in the film which lead to no-where. At one address Cinque makes an interesting drive of international law that might help the case. While the legal minds are inspired by his insight and initiative, the idea is quickly dismissed as infeasible and he plays almost no role in designing the case which might lead to his freedom. The events on the slave ship are even more scattered. Cinque is involved in a brief eye-contact race with a young woman but there is no development to give it mad power. The womens ensuing death is as shocking as it is unexpected and while it works as a good visual, her undeveloped role as a original person results in the loss of any deeper meaning. Furthermore, the Amistad case is portrayed as a spark that helped ignite the Civil War, but the movie does non go into greater detail. It simply flashes ahead and shows that the Civil War had begun.Also, the fact that few strong personal bonds develop between the principal characters to give the bilgewater the aflame force that it needs hurts the dramatic level of the film. There is an obvious connection between the Africans leader, Cinque, and the young lawyer work ing for his release. However, the strength of this budding consanguinity is unconvincing. Moreover, it is seriously disrupted when control of the defense team is taken over by the aging ex-president, John Quincy Adams. Furthermore, the movie lacked depth in the Supreme Courtroom. In Washington, only one side of the case is presented that of the Amistad captives.Amistad essays research papers Amistad is about a mutiny in 1839 aboard a slave ship, La Amistad, which eventually comes to port in New England. The West Africans who have commandeered the ship are taken into custody and the plot revolves around who "owns" them or if, indeed, they should be freed. This sets up the main event of the film, a courtroom drama about rights and origins, with the required flashbacks to the voyage and the gruesome conditions aboard the ship. The problem with this approach is that we learn less about the real conditions of slavery and instead focus on the more sanitized conditions surround ing the courtroom. In addition, we get a film which is largely about the efforts of the whites battling the case and oft less about the struggles of the Africans themselves.There are too many strands in the film which lead to no-where. At one point Cinque makes an interesting point of international law that might help the case. While the legal minds are inspired by his insight and initiative, the idea is quickly dismissed as unworkable and he plays almost no role in designing the case which might lead to his freedom. The events on the slave ship are even more scattered. Cinque is involved in a brief eye-contact relationship with a young woman but there is no development to give it emotional power. The womens ensuing death is as shocking as it is unexpected and while it works as a good visual, her undeveloped role as a real person results in the loss of any deeper meaning. Furthermore, the Amistad case is portrayed as a spark that helped ignite the Civil War, but the movie does not go into greater detail. It simply flashes ahead and shows that the Civil War had begun.Also, the fact that few strong personal bonds develop between the principal characters to give the taradiddle the emotional force that it needs hurts the dramatic level of the film. There is an obvious connection between the Africans leader, Cinque, and the young lawyer working for his release. However, the strength of this budding relationship is unconvincing. Moreover, it is seriously disrupted when control of the defense team is taken over by the aging ex-president, John Quincy Adams. Furthermore, the movie lacked depth in the Supreme Courtroom. In Washington, only one side of the case is presented that of the Amistad captives.